Do you believe:

·      Building stable, peaceful, productive nations takes generations? 

·      Warring generally reverses peaceful nation building? 

·      America needs to implement a civilian national volunteer corps, such as outlined in Peoples Lobby American World Service Corps (AWSC) Congressional Proposals?  www.WorldServiceCorps.us  

·      Or a civilian national service corps more closely aligned with what this administration seems to define as military service “to serve in the defining struggle of our time”?

 

State of Union needs volunteer national service, as in Peoples Lobby American World Service Corps Congressional Proposals

                                        Dwayne Hunn

 

“One of the first steps we can take together is to add to the ranks of our military so that the American Armed Forces are ready for all the challenges ahead. Tonight I ask the Congress to authorize an increase in the size of our active Army and Marine Corps by 92,000 in the next 5 years. A second task we can take on together is to design and establish a volunteer Civilian Reserve Corps. Such a corps would function much like our military reserve. It would ease the burden on the Armed Forces by allowing us to hire civilians with critical skills to serve on missions abroad when America needs them. And it would give people across America who do not wear the uniform a chance to serve in the defining struggle of our time.”                                  President Bush, State of Union 1-23-2007

 

In past years, the President’s administration often talked of “nation building.”  Even a cursory worldview makes many question whether we are building or destroying nations. 

 

To many, the President’s Civilian Reserve Corps does not sound like nation builders.  It sounds more like, perhaps, a government financed Black Hawk Security Program.

 

Peoples Lobby’s cost-effective, citizen-initiated American World Service Corps (AWSC) Congressional Proposals builds a volunteer civilian corps that nation builds and enhances world stability.  www.WorldServiceCorps.us

 

Bush also said:

 

This war is more than a clash of arms it is a decisive ideological struggle, and the security of our Nation is in the balance. To prevail, we must remove the conditions that inspire blind hatred, and drove 19 men to get onto airplanes and come to kill us. What every terrorist fears most is human freedom societies where men and women make their own choices, answer to their own conscience, and live by their hopes instead of their resentments. Free people are not drawn to violent and malignant ideologies and most will choose a better way when they are given a chance. So we advance our own security interests by helping moderates, reformers, and brave voices for democracy. The great question of our day is whether America will help men and women in the Middle East to build free societies and share in the rights of all humanity. And I say, for the sake of our own security we must.

 

In short, the President was saying that 21st century warfare and competition revolves around winning hearts and minds to support the ideals of democracy rather than myopic ideologies. 

 

The American World Service Corps (AWSC) Congressional Proposals recognize that winning hearts and minds and nation building does not happen via Six Year Wars.  Open societies and peaceful, productive nations are built over generations via increasing literacy, health, understanding, small and micro businesses, etc.

 

Introducing, passing, and implementing the AWSC Congressional Proposals will inspire a million volunteer American nurses, teachers, appropriate technology workers, small businessmen, etc., to immerse themselves into winning hearts and minds that will create stable nations and a more peaceful and productive world.

 

It may have helped the world more if instead of reading Albert Camus’ The Stranger, the President would have read Four Star Marine General Anthony Zinni’s The Battle for Peace.  

 

The Stranger may have been searching for order and meaning in the world.  The General was doing the same, as he searched for world stability that would make life safer for his troops.  Zinni, a supporter (http://worldservicecorps.us/zinni%20to%20aucone%2011-06.htm) of the American World Service Corps, stated why we need this peaceful, productive, volunteer AWSC:

 

“The military may bring emergency capacities at scales and speeds that NGOs can’t begin to approach; the NGOs bring a depth of un­derstanding of the needs, requirements, and capacities for long-term recovery that we don’t have.

 

“The NGOs complain that the military, with its monolithic and structured perspective, misses the subtleties of humanitarian aid and its aftermath. In their view, we set up systems that are not trans­ferable, and we make the people we’re trying to help too dependent on the aid we provide. The NGOs have a different approach. They start with humanitarian aid: you have to save lives at risk. But then you have to move to what they call “sustainment” as quickly as pos­sible. The idea is to leave behind systems that the people themselves can operate. “Don’t give them fish;’ the saying goes, “Teach them •how to fish.’

 

If you believe the American World Service Corps (AWSC) Congressional Proposals are a smarter way to build world stability contact your Congressional reps and ask them to introduce, cosponsor, and implement.  To connect to your rep, call 866-220-0044.

 

Also at Indy Bay News http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/01/24/18351229.php

 

 

     -----