Traffic in Marin:
Where do we go now?

In the late 1970s, Peter
Calthorpe was an associate of State Architect to-be Sim Van der Ryn, working to
establish a Solar Village at Hamilton Air Force Base. By the 1980s, Peter was on his own, preaching development
Pedestrian Pocket communities where people could walk to and from parks,
schools, work places and transit options other than the car nestled in
suburbia’s omnipresent garage.
Pedestrian Pockets offered the opportunity to develop the community that ethnic neighborhoods of the 40’s and 50’s and Peter Calthorpe’s Sausalito houseboat neighbors had. Unfortunately, Marin’s presumed environmentalists -- and the power structure they supported, wouldn’t listen to concepts that allowed clustered communities of affordable housing to be built on at least 13+ large parcels that then laid adjacent to Marin and Sonoma’s Northwest Pacific Right of Way.
For years, few seemed to pay attention to Calthorpe’s rejuvenated concept or to pay for his services. Luckily, his Berkeley students helped keep him going until the rest of the country realized the good sense of Pedestrian Pockets and paid him to do them.
In a shrinking world where
our lifestyle consumes more than its proportional share, and our lack of
community produces an abundance of dysfunctional acts, Pedestrian Pockets
design part of the needed solutions.
In 1991 Peter was the keynote
speaker for the region’s first Land Use and Transportation Conference sponsored
by North Bay Transportation & Management Association, the first such
association in Northern California.
Twenty regional leaders participated in the all day conference, where
400 listened and participated with the panels.
On Saturday, a similar
conference will be held with Phil Erickson of Calthorpe & Associates
serving as a keynote speaker. Phil will
report on a study that Peter has tried to fund for 20 years -- a Sonoma/Marin
transportation and land-use study.
Twenty years ago those 13+ large parcels were less fettered, with
planned or existing expensive suburban sprawl homes entwined amid a morass of
costly curbs, gutters and dead end streets.
But it is better late than
never for Marin and Sonoma counties to use their remaining land to support uses
that enhance the environment through more sustainable developments that allow
for beneficial reuse of the rail line with passenger and freight traffic.
Thanks to narrow-minded
planning, Marin rates at the bottom of the Bay Region’s nine county list when
its labor market independence is ranked.
In Marin, 70 percent of county workers live here versus Sonoma’s
comparable 94 percent. In Marin, 59
percent of employed county residents work here versus Sonoma’s comparable 82
percent. In Marin’s construction
transportation, communications and public utilities industries,
inbound-commutes hover near 50 percent versus Sonoma’s 10 percent.
Let’s hope Marin will waste
no more time in providing land uses that will help make the rail line more
economically viable. Even before Pedestrian Pockets are built, the existing
rail line can help reduce environmental impacts. Consider:
·
As
development moves forward on Bel Marin Keys, Hamilton Field and St.
Vincent/Silveira, wouldn’t it be more environmentally beneficial to import
needed fill and building materials by train rather than by road hammering,
pollution belching trucks?
And when you consider how
much more fuel efficient trains are than cars, and how they, too, add to
community building:
·
Wouldn’t
Marin’s true environmentalists want to start setting the environmental and
community standards for other parts of the country that have the same
opportunity we have?
Dwayne Hunn, who lives in Mill valley, was Executive Director of the North Bay TMA and now works on land use, transportation and political issues as well as with Excel Telecommunications.